There is an obvious problem immediately apparent with such a dramatic departure from the long standing focus on learning a subject to gain a rating; how would one ever structure such a multi disciplined curriculum requiring the diverse range of skills and interests so that it could be resourced and assessed?  How will the kids know what to do and how to do it if we don’t first go through the subject based model with all of its text books to ensure they have all the skills they need to embark on such a wide ranging raft of enquiry and experiences?  The answer is found in the mode of delivery.  A multiage cohort of twelve, thirteen and fourteen year old students working as a cohesive group of twenty to twenty five can conquer the world if teachers would just let them.  All the advantages of learning as a mixed age group of Copycats, Stickybeaks and Scallywags come to the fore, no IFFs (These are Inbuilt Failure Factors) to hinder them, and a new paradigm of learning and interaction would become possible.  

The then following three to four year period of school with its intense "Learning to Learn with a real pur[ose"‘ would have depth and meaning for all and result in very close to a hundred percent success for everyone.  The long term effect on society would be dramatic and the current thirty percent failure rate for first year university students would be close to zero.  In effect the annual savings across the board would be many millions of dollars, increasing every year thereafter.  Savings on prisons alone by these figures https://www.ceda.com.au/NewsAndResources/Opinion/Economy/Australia-pays-the-price-for-increasing-rates-of-i would be in the billions.  Can we afford to carry on with education induced inequity any longer?  Here are the nineteen modules for you and your students to get stuck into.